![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiXT73qY8UvEeCX74WoN_99NRdpGAXTudfaoGGvXP99AD5yqVLN3dwGxjZyiwGTe3psYib1v6CEdicTxaRr7OKWTNDxmh5Y11HUITnIyTHvOHl2hvgKpPaGwvxMXytgQrthdqKxWM7sajiL/s1600/13.jpg)
The premise is largely explained by the title of the film. To say that the precinct house is understaffed or running on a skeleton crew is an understatement. the precinct has been shut down and moved to another location, and is currently manned by one first-day-on-the-job police Sargent Ethan Bishop (Battle For The Planet Of The Apes, Roots), one secretary and one telephone operator. The electricity and phone service are to be cancelled the next morning. A prison bus with a driver, two guards, three prisoners, and a partridge in a pear tree (just kidding: a detective, not a bird in a tree) have to make an emergency stop and after a very disoriented civilian enter the building they fall under siege by a gang. Now, I'm no expert on standard gang membership, but this gang seemed to have way more members (and on sight, I might add) then I would have expected compared to, say, The Outsiders or The Warriors. Speaking of The Warriors, I found myself making a comparison in my mind between it and this film because they both have a small cast of main characters (with one strong female character, now that I think about it, thought I found Assault's female character far more likable than the woman in Warriors) faced with a very difficult/dangerous task and a horde of human enemies seeking their end. And they're both 70's movies which will inherently create aesthetic similarities especially when seen with modern eyes.
Having not seen the remake, I can only comment that the races of two of the main characters were switched from a black cop (who grew up in the very rough neighborhood of the precinct in question) and a white criminal/prisoner to a white cop and a black criminal/prisoner. Some poignant statements were made in the original film about not letting your origin limit or define you though it can certainly influence what you will become, and I imagine some opportunities must have been wasted in the remake. If you've seen the remake, please comment and let me know your thoughts on the matter (or even if you haven't seen it, let me know what you think). This is one of the few films I watch that I would say have re-play value and that I think I'll watch a second time (I'll say the same for The Deaths Of Ian Stone) sharing it with others who have not yet seen it. I'd probably give it 4 stars, maybe 4.5. If you like 70's movies with police and gangs, if you like siege stories, or tales of a small group against huge odds, and especially if you like memorable lines... then this movie is for you. However if one-liners just bug you, if you don't like out-dated aesthetics or low-res films, if you like more explosions in your action movies (i.e. Die Hard With A Vengeance, which, don't get me wrong, I really enjoyed) then you might want to give this one a pass.
Bruce campell personally protects precients 1-12, so there was no issue with those.
ReplyDelete